Sunday, 16 March 2014

Blog Questions- for 19/03.


Foreshadowing is employed on Page 62 through the boy playing with his toy truck, McCarthy writes that the boy “made truck noises”, it is used to build tension within the page as on the same page the man is said to wake from the noise of a truck and people on the “cracked macadam”. This allows the reader to look back and realise that the truck was foreshadowed by the boy as seemingly moments before (almost a night, but due to contracted time it is portrayed in seconds), the boy was playing with his toy truck on the same road. The men in this sequence are shown to be unorganised, shown through their use of “clubs” and “pipe” allowing them to be viewed as non military, the characterisation of the men also shows them to be infected as it were shown through their “coughing”. This suggests to the reader that no-one is seemingly safe from whatever is destroying the world, as some of the men are in “canister masks”, a “biohazard suit”, suggesting there is no escaping the death that has befallen the land within the novel.

McCarthy uses the simile “lumbering and creaking like a ship” when describing the diesel truck that has appeared on the road as it can be viewed in a twisted biblical sense as the opposite of a saviour, as it is unlike in “Noah’s Ark” carrying men/weaponry/animals that will not save/rebuild the world, but destroy it even further. On page 65 the man and the boy meet the Road Rat, he is described in much detail in my opinion as it is the first character that they meet on their journey within the novel, he also shows how desolate the human race has become, as for example McCarthy describes him to look like “an animal inside a skull looking out the eyeholes”, a very dark image.

The Road Rat is shown to be very explicit whilst the man is very implicit as I believe it shows the diversity in intelligence between the pair, this is shown as the man is indirect in saying he is going to shoot and kill the Road Rat, shown in his line “yes they will, but you won’t” when describing the gunshot to the Road Rat, whereas the Road Rat simply asks the man if he “is a doctor”, suggesting he is not intelligent in the ways he gets information. Through the man’s exchanges with the Road Rat on pages 67/68 it is learnt that he is extremely intelligent through his impressive knowledge of the human brain, shown in the line “you will need a frontal lobe and things with names like colliculus and temporal gyrus”, it is inferred that he may have been a doctor. However, on page 68 the Man performs a drop, roll and shot before shooting the Road Rat in the middle of the head, this suggests that the man may have had a more sinister profession than this is, as to perform this without previous training etc. would be a virtually impossible task, the man may now be considered to be FBI etc.  

The line “A single round left in the revolver. You will not face the truth. You will not” is the man seemingly echoing his dead wife’s words earlier in the novel, I believe the Man utters these words in a futile sense to punish his wife, but I believe they are equally said in a motivational sense, this is because she has told him he cannot do it, but humans are programmed to attempt to defy others expectations of them, meaning he may be saying in to push himself to save his own and his sons lives to prove his cowardly wife wrong. It seems strange that after killing their friend the other survivors do not attempt to find the man and his boy, however this becomes clear on page 73/74 as the other men have seemingly eaten their friend that the man and the boy had shot, this suggests that the reason they did not give chase was because they did not need to waste energy and risk being killed, as their next meal was laying there in front of them, dead. This clearly shows the cannibalism and savagery that has taken over the world in turmoil, and that friendships etc. no longer matter, but instead murder and cannibalism are more prominent.

On page 68 the Road Rat is shot dead, the dead man’s “gore” and “brains” go all over the young boys face, despite this it is not until page 77 (9 pages later) until we see the man wash the boy clean. In my opinion, this is because cleaning the boy is not one of the man’s basic primal instincts, however finding food, keeping warm and staying safe are. This shows the man to be juxtaposed to his actions on the previous page, as he spoke about the brain etc. with superior intellect, but yet is still basic enough to not see the Road Rats brains all over his son as a situation that must be dealt with, nevertheless it is still a fact that cleaning the boy is not as important to him as staying alive. There is also a simpler explanation to why the man did not clean his boys face, this is that he could simply find no water to clean the boy that did not have a risk of killing him in the process, this is shown on page 15 as McCarthy writes there is “black water running”, reiterating the point that it may be hard for the man to find clean enough water to bathe his boy in, this still links to the point that the man has to keep the boy safe and not put him in any danger, else his wife would have seemingly been right in saying the man cannot look after the boy.

No comments:

Post a Comment